View

The Study

A Meal with Ultra-Processed Foods Leads to a Faster Rate of Intake and to a Lesser Decrease in the Capacity to Eat When Compared to a Similar, Matched Meal Without Ultra-Processed Foods

In simple terms

This study showed that when people with obesity ate a meal made of ultra-processed foods, they ate it faster and felt like they could eat more afterward—compared to a similar meal made of regular food. But it only looked at one meal, so we don’t know if this leads to weight gain or health problems over time.

69%

Analysis score

69/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology61
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists gave people with obesity two breakfasts that had the same calories and nutrients — one made of ultra-processed foods, one made of regular foods — and watched how they ate and how their bodies reacted.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
69

69 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Even when food is equally healthy, ultra-processing makes you eat faster and feel less full right after — which might lead to eating more overall.
  2. 2People ate the ultra-processed meal in 7.9 minutes vs.
  3. 311.1 minutes for the regular meal, chewed less, and felt they could eat more afterward (39.7 mm vs.
  4. 424.0 mm on a hunger scale).
  5. 5Their hormones and metabolism didn't change differently between meals.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Nutrients

Year

2024

Authors

Maria Bárbara Galdino-Silva, K.M.M. Almeida, A. D. Oliveira, J. V. L. Santos, M. Macena, D. R. Silva, M. R. Pereira, A. Silva-Júnior, D. C. Ferro, D. Paula, Guilherme César de Oliveira Carvalho, M. V. C. Rocha, Juliane Pereira da Silva, E. Barreto, N. Bueno

Open Access
16 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.