View

The Study

The Effectiveness of Time-Restricted Eating as an Intermittent Fasting Approach on Shift Workers’ Glucose Metabolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

In simple terms

This study looked at lots of small experiments where people tried eating only during the day, but the results were all over the place—sometimes glucose went down a little, sometimes it didn’t. We can’t say for sure if it helps because the studies were too small and messy.

60%

Analysis score

60/ 100

Maximum 100 for a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology19
Publication100
Statistical100
Study type (basis of the score)
Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Level 1a - Systematic review of RCTs
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists looked at six small studies where night workers tried eating only during the day and fasting at night to see if it helped their blood sugar and sleep.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)
Level 1a
60

60 / 100

Quality score

The highest quality evidence. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses that pool randomized controlled trials, giving the most reliable summary of experimental evidence.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1The changes were so small and uncertain that they don't mean anything practical for night workers — it's like flipping a coin and getting slightly more heads, but not enough to say the coin is rigged.
  2. 2Blood sugar and insulin didn't change much — the differences were tiny and could be due to chance.
  3. 3Sleep didn't get better either.
  4. 4Only one study had a long enough fast (14 hours); others were shorter.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Nutrients

Year

2025

Authors

Jia Ying Jennell Koh, Celine Yu Han Tan, Meng Li, M. Liu, H. S. J. Chew

Open Access
7 citations
Analysis v6
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.