View

The Study

Impact of Artificial Sweeteners on Inflammation Markers: A Systematic Review of Animal Studies

In simple terms

This study looked at what happened to mice and rats when they drank artificial sweeteners — it found some signs of swelling and irritation in their bodies. But it didn’t test people, so we can’t say if it does the same thing to humans.

8%

Analysis score

8/ 100

Maximum 100 for a systematic review.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology4
Publication100
Statistical23
Study type (basis of the score)
Systematic Review
Level 2a - Systematic review of cohort studies
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists gave mice different sugar-free sweeteners and checked if they got more inflamed. Some sweeteners made mice more inflamed, especially in their guts and blood, but not all sweeteners did the same thing every time.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Reviews of Cohort Studies
Level 2a
8

8 / 100

Quality score

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cohort studies. They sit above a single cohort study but below a single randomized trial, because the underlying evidence is still observational.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Mouse doses are much higher than human intake — 100x more — so results may not apply directly to people.
  2. 2Aspartame and sucralose raised inflammatory markers in most mouse studies; sucralose also damaged gut lining and changed gut bacteria; acesulfame K and saccharin had mixed results.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Nutrients

Year

2025

Authors

P. Raoul, Maurizio Romanò, Francesca Sofia Galli, M. Cintoni, Esmeralda Capristo, V. Mora, M. C. Mele, Antonio Gasbarrini, E. Rinninella

Open Access
1 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

Scientists test artificial sweeteners on animals using way more than humans would ever eat, then say it’s safe for people by dividing that huge dose by 100—but that doesn’t match how much people actually consume.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

When rats and mice are given saccharin (an artificial sweetener), sometimes their liver gets more inflamed, sometimes their gut gets less inflamed, and sometimes nothing changes—so the effect depends on how much they get, how long they get it, and what health condition they have.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

If rodents eat aspartame over a long time, their bodies seem to show more signs of inflammation in the blood, brain, liver, and fat tissue, and some internal alarm systems that trigger inflammation get turned on.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

When rats and mice eat sucralose, a common artificial sweetener, their guts get more inflamed, their intestinal lining gets weaker, and the good and bad bacteria in their intestines change — all of which might cause body-wide inflammation.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

When rats and mice are given a lot of acesulfame potassium (an artificial sweetener), their guts and livers show more signs of inflammation, but if they get only a little or are in a different setup, no inflammation shows up—suggesting there’s a limit to when it causes problems.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

When mice and rats eat artificial sweeteners like aspartame and sucralose for a long time, their gut bacteria get out of balance, lose variety, and start acting more inflammatory—which might explain why these sweeteners could make the body more prone to inflammation.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.