View

The Study

Time of Day and Training Status Both Impact the Efficacy of Caffeine for Short Duration Cycling Performance

In simple terms

This study gave people caffeine or a sugar pill and saw how fast they rode a bike at different times of day. Because they randomly picked who got what, we can say caffeine probably helped some people ride faster—but we can't say it will help everyone the same way.

64%

Analysis score

64/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology65
Publication100
Statistical54
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists gave cyclists a caffeine pill and had them race a short bike course in the morning and evening, with and without caffeine, to see when it helped most.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
64

64 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1A 2-3% improvement in a 3-km race is meaningful — it could mean winning or losing in competitive cycling.
  2. 2Caffeine made all cyclists 2.3% faster in the morning and 1.4% faster in the evening.
  3. 3Untrained cyclists got a bigger boost in the evening (2.9%) than trained ones.
  4. 4Trained cyclists only got faster in the morning.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Nutrients

Year

2016

Authors

J. Boyett, G. E. Giersch, C. Womack, M. Saunders, C. A. Hughey, Hannah M. Daley, N. Luden

Open Access
47 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.