View

The Study

Supercritical CO2 Extraction vs. Hexane Extraction and Cold Pressing: Comparative Analysis of Seed Oils from Six Plant Species

In simple terms

This study looked at how different ways of squeezing oil from seeds change the chemicals inside the oil — like how much vitamin-like stuff or antioxidants are there. It didn’t test if any of these oils are better for your body, just how they look in a lab test tube.

7%

Analysis score

7/ 44

Maximum 44 for a cross-sectional study.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology19
Publication100
Statistical54
Study type (basis of the score)
Cross-Sectional Study
Level 4 - Case series
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists tested three ways to squeeze oil from seeds: using hot gas (CO2), chemicals (hexane), or pressing without heat. They found CO2 pulls out more healthy stuff like phytosterols and squalene without leaving toxic chemicals behind.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cross-Sectional & Case Series
Level 4
7

7 / 100

Quality score

Snapshots of a population at a single point in time, or descriptions of small groups. Can identify correlations and prevalence, but cannot determine cause and effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — this means CO2-extracted oils could be more powerful for skin care and supplements because they contain more natural antioxidants.
  2. 2Pumpkin oil made with CO2 had 4% healthy compounds vs.
  3. 31.1% from pressing; it also blocked 39–50% of free radicals — much better than other methods.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Plants

Year

2024

Authors

K. Schoss, N. K. Glavač

Open Access
26 citations
Analysis v6

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

Hexane is used to extract oils from plants in food manufacturing and is not required to appear on ingredient labels because regulators classify it as a processing aid.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Supercritical CO2 extraction, cold pressing, and hexane extraction result in seed oils with the same fatty acid profiles, meaning none of these methods changes the core nutritional composition of the triglycerides more than the others.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Oils extracted from pumpkin, marigold, flax, and linden seeds using supercritical CO2 contain more bioactive compounds like phytosterols and squalene than oils extracted by cold pressing or hexane, making them more potent for use in cosmetics and nutrition.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

Supercritical CO2 extraction produces pumpkin seed oil with a higher concentration of phytosterols than cold pressing or hexane extraction, with the C-V3 fraction containing 4.0% unsaponifiable matter compared to 1.1% in cold-pressed oil.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

Pumpkin seed oil extract contains compounds called squalene and cycloartenol that remove 39–50% of free radicals in laboratory tests, and this antioxidant effect is stronger than that of other seed oils tested under the same conditions.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

Supercritical CO2 extraction separates seed oils into specific chemical layers, enabling the isolation of squalene and γ-tocopherol in later layers, a result not achieved by cold pressing or hexane extraction.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.