View

The Study

A clinical evaluation of liposomal (Lipomac™) versus nonliposomal vitamin C: A randomized, open-label, cross-over trial in healthy subjects

In simple terms

This study showed that one kind of vitamin C pill gets into the blood more than another kind — like seeing which juice gets absorbed faster. But it didn’t test if that makes people healthier, so we can’t say it’s better for you — just that it shows up more in blood tests.

44%

Analysis score

44/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology45
Publication100
Statistical31
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists tested two kinds of vitamin C pills: one wrapped in tiny fat bubbles (liposomal), and one regular. They measured how much got into the blood.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
44

44 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — the fat-bubble version put more than twice as much vitamin C into the bloodstream, which might mean it works better.
  2. 2The fat-bubble vitamin C reached 16,462 ng/mL in blood and stayed in the body longer (AUC: 122,809), while the regular one only reached 6,950 ng/mL (AUC: 60,506).

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Natural Resources for Human Health

Year

2026

Authors

Sravani Thimmannagari, Shivaprasad Hn, Arnab Chatterjee, Madhu Krishnamani, Gaurav Soni, D. Manohar

Open Access
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.