Among non-Hispanic white adults aged 18–70, drinking sugar-sweetened beverages more often is linked to a higher ratio of visceral fat to subcutaneous fat, even when accounting for overall body fat and body mass index.
See the scientific wording
In non-Hispanic white adults aged 18–70, higher frequency of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption is associated with a greater proportion of visceral adipose tissue relative to subcutaneous fat (VAT%), independent of total body fat percentage and BMI.
Correlational — new studies may shift this
ObservationalOne moderate-quality study links this claim to the outcome, but causation is not established.
What the research says
1 study reviewedSupporting (1)
Sugar-sweetened and diet beverages in relation to visceral adipose tissue
Cross-Sectional StudyHuman2012
People who drink more sugary sodas tend to have more fat around their organs, even if they aren’t heavier or fatter overall—this kind of fat is riskier for heart disease and diabetes.
Contradicting (0)
No contradicting studies found yet
That doesn't mean it's settled — it just means no study has tested the opposite.
Quality-weighted scoring: we follow the GRADE framework — each study is rated High, Moderate, Low, or Very Low based on study design, methodology rigor, and risk of bias. A single high-quality RCT can outweigh several weaker observational studies.
Scores reflect study quality, not just count.
When people drink sugary beverages, the fructose in them goes straight to the liver, where it gets turned into fat. This fat is packaged and sent into the bloodstream, where it gets pulled into fat tissue around the organs instead of under the skin. The liver also becomes less responsive to insulin, which prevents the body from stopping fat breakdown in the abdominal area, causing more fat to build up there.
Score breakdown, mechanism chain, raw evidence, ideal studies needed & 1 supporting study
How Fit Body Science checks a claim
- 1
We isolate the claim
Health advice from videos, articles and studies is broken down into single, testable claims.
- 2
We find the research
Each claim is matched against peer-reviewed studies, with every source cited by DOI.
- 3
We grade the evidence
Studies are scored on methodology, statistical rigor, transparency and publication quality.
The fitness and health internet is full of confident claims. We check them against real research.
Every claim on this site is traced back to peer-reviewed studies, scored on methodology and reporting quality, and given a verdict you can audit yourself — sources, DOIs and all.
- Full evidence breakdown and mechanism chains
- Ask our AI anything about a claim or its studies
- Get notified when new research changes a verdict
Among non-Hispanic white adults aged 18–70, drinking sugar-sweetened beverages more often is linked to a higher ratio of visceral fat to subcutaneous fat, even when accounting for overall body fat and body mass index.
Mechanism
1 studyDrinking sugary beverages sends fructose to the liver, which turns it into fat and releases it into the blood. This fat goes mostly to the area around the organs because that tissue pulls in fat more aggressively. The liver also becomes less sensitive to insulin, which stops it from slowing down fat release from the belly, so more fat builds up there.
When people drink sugary beverages, the fructose in them goes straight to the liver, where it gets turned into fat. This fat is packaged and sent into the bloodstream, where it gets pulled into fat tissue around the organs instead of under the skin. The liver also becomes less responsive to insulin, which prevents the body from stopping fat breakdown in the abdominal area, causing more fat to build up there.
Fructose from sucrose or high-fructose corn syrup in beverages is absorbed in the small intestine and transported to the liver via the portal vein
Hepatic metabolism of fructose bypasses rate-limiting steps of glycolysis, leading to increased substrate flux for de novo lipogenesis and production of triglycerides
Increased hepatic triglyceride synthesis and VLDL secretion elevate circulating free fatty acids, which are preferentially taken up by visceral adipocytes due to higher lipoprotein lipase activity and blood flow
Fructose-induced hepatic insulin resistance reduces insulin-mediated suppression of lipolysis in visceral fat, further promoting fat accumulation and inflammation
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Community contributions welcome
Sugar-sweetened and diet beverages in relation to visceral adipose tissue
People who drink more sugary sodas tend to have more fat around their organs, even if they aren’t heavier or fatter overall—this kind of fat is riskier for heart disease and diabetes.
Contradicting (0)
Community contributions welcome
Score Breakdown
No multi-axis breakdown available yet. The overall Pro / Against score above is the best signal.
- No clinical evidence is available; the score reflects mechanistic plausibility only.
What Would Prove This
Per GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this claim, ordered from strongest to weakest.
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake and Visceral Adipose Tissue Proportion in Non-Hispanic White Adults
Population: Non-Hispanic white adults aged 18–70; Intervention: Self-reported frequency of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption; Comparator: Low vs. high consumption groups; Outcome: VAT% measured by MRI or CT; Duration: Longitudinal data pooled from existing studies; Adjustment: For BMI and total body fat percentage.
Randomized Controlled Trial of High vs. Low Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake on VAT% in Non-Hispanic White Adults
Population: Non-Hispanic white adults aged 18–70; Intervention: High daily sugar-sweetened beverage intake (e.g., 500 mL/day); Comparator: Isocaloric non-sugary beverage control; Outcome: Change in VAT% via MRI over 12 weeks; Duration: 12 weeks; Adjustment: Baseline BMI and total body fat percentage.
Prospective Cohort Study of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption and VAT% Change in Non-Hispanic White Adults
Population: Non-Hispanic white adults aged 18–70; Intervention: Baseline and repeated measures of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption; Comparator: Low, moderate, high consumers; Outcome: Change in VAT% measured by imaging over 5 years; Duration: 5 years; Adjustment: Baseline and time-varying BMI and total body fat percentage.
Cross-Sectional Analysis of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake and VAT% in Non-Hispanic White Adults
Population: Non-Hispanic white adults aged 18–70; Intervention: Single measurement of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption; Comparator: Low vs. high consumers; Outcome: VAT% measured by imaging at one time point; Duration: Single time point; Adjustment: BMI and total body fat percentage.
Case-Control Study of High VAT% vs. Normal VAT% in Non-Hispanic White Adults and Prior Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption
Population: Non-Hispanic white adults aged 18–70; Cases: Individuals with VAT% above 90th percentile; Controls: Individuals with VAT% below 50th percentile; Intervention: Retrospective assessment of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption frequency; Comparator: Cases vs. controls; Outcome: Odds ratio of high consumption in high VAT% group; Duration: Retrospective recall over prior 1–5 years; Adjustment: BMI and total body fat percentage.