By having each person train one leg one way and the other leg another way, the study made sure that differences in people’s bodies didn’t mess up the results—so we can be sure it’s the training method, not the person, that matters.
Scientific Claim
In well-trained men, the use of a within-subject, contralateral leg design with volume equilibration effectively isolates the effects of training method on muscular adaptations, minimizing inter-individual variability and providing high internal validity for comparisons between resistance training protocols.
Original Statement
“Participants had one leg fixed in the TRAD while the contralateral leg performed either CP or DS to allow for TTV equalization.”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
definitive
Can make definitive causal claims
Assessment Explanation
The study explicitly describes and justifies the within-subject design, which is a recognized gold standard for minimizing variability. The claim accurately reflects this design feature.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Scientists tested three different workout styles on each person’s left and right leg, making sure all legs did the same total amount of work. Since the results were the same no matter the style, they could be sure the differences in workout type—not individual differences—were what mattered.