The Claim
Colibactin-producing Escherichia coli strains induce specific double-strand DNA breaks in colonic epithelial cells, resulting in mutational signatures SBS88 and ID18.
What the research says
Supports is higher
Support is ahead, but a single strong opposing study can change this.
These are independent scores, not a percentage. Higher-grade studies count more, so a single strong opposing study can outweigh several weaker ones.
Certain strains of Escherichia coli that produce colibactin cause distinct double-strand breaks in the DNA of cells lining the colon, leading to characteristic mutation patterns known as SBS88 and ID18.
See the scientific wording
Colibactin-producing Escherichia coli strains induce specific double-strand DNA breaks in colonic epithelial cells, resulting in mutational signatures SBS88 and ID18.
What the research says
4 studiesStudy: Geographic and age variations in mutational processes in colorectal cancer
This study found that a type of harmful gut bacteria leaves a unique fingerprint in the DNA of colon cancer cells, especially in younger people. These fingerprints match what scientists expect from the bacteria’s toxin, so it’s strong evidence that the bacteria causes this specific DNA damage.
This study shows that a specific type of gut bacteria produces a toxin that damages DNA in colon cells in a very specific way, leaving a fingerprint called SBS88 — exactly what the claim says.
This study found that people with certain rare gut bacteria produce a toxin that leaves a specific fingerprint of DNA damage in colon cells — exactly the kind of damage the claim says these bacteria cause.
Study: Surface expression of antitoxin on engineered bacteria neutralizes genotoxic colibactin in the gut
This study shows that a harmful chemical made by certain gut bacteria damages DNA, and when scientists block that chemical, the damage stops. Since this exact type of DNA damage is linked to two known cancer-related signatures, the study supports the idea that these bacteria cause those signatures.
Score breakdown, mechanism chain, raw evidence, ideal studies needed & 4 supporting studies
Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.
