The Claim

Does hydraulic resistance HIIT burn more calories than traditional cardio or weight training?

Source: Caloric Expenditure of Aerobic, Resistance, or Combined High-Intensity Interval Training Using a Hydraulic Resistance System in Healthy Men

What the research says

Supports is higher

Support is ahead, but a single strong opposing study can change this.

Supports
26score
Challenges
0score

These are independent scores, not a percentage. Higher-grade studies count more, so a single strong opposing study can outweigh several weaker ones.

Quantitative
1 study reviewed
In plain English

Doing a 30-minute workout on a hydraulic machine with short bursts of all-out effort burns more calories than the same amount of time lifting weights, running on a treadmill, or riding a bike.

See the scientific wording

In healthy, recreationally active men, a 30-minute high-intensity interval training session using a hydraulic resistance system (HRS) results in a caloric expenditure of 12.62 ± 2.36 kcal·min⁻¹, which is significantly higher than that of 30-minute sessions of resistance training (8.83 ± 1.55 kcal·min⁻¹), treadmill endurance (9.48 ± 1.30 kcal·min⁻¹), or cycling endurance (9.23 ± 1.25 kcal·min⁻¹).

What the research says

1 study
  1. Study: Caloric Expenditure of Aerobic, Resistance, or Combined High-Intensity Interval Training Using a Hydraulic Resistance System in Healthy Men

    The study found that doing a 30-minute intense workout on a hydraulic machine burned more calories than lifting weights, running on a treadmill, or cycling for the same amount of time — exactly what the claim says.

Score breakdown, mechanism chain, raw evidence, ideal studies needed & 1 supporting studies

Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health claims into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.