correlational
Analysis v1
0
Pro
13
Against

Mice given MOTS-c burned more sugar for energy and produced more body heat—even though they didn’t move around more than the control mice.

Scientific Claim

In mice, MOTS-c treatment increased respiratory exchange ratio and heat production, indicating a shift toward greater glucose utilization and elevated energy expenditure, independent of physical activity levels.

Original Statement

MOTS-c treated mice also generated significantly more heat that may, in part, account for the increased energy expenditure... MOTS-c treated mice showed increased respiratory exchange ratio (RER)... Total activity was comparable between the 2 groups.

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

overstated

Study Design Support

Design cannot support claim

Appropriate Language Strength

association

Can only show association/correlation

Assessment Explanation

The study uses language implying causation ('increased energy expenditure') but lacks human data or randomized controls. Only an associative interpretation is valid.

More Accurate Statement

In mice, MOTS-c treatment was associated with an increased respiratory exchange ratio and higher heat production, indicating a shift toward greater glucose utilization and elevated energy expenditure, independent of physical activity levels.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (0)

0
No supporting evidence found

Contradicting (1)

13

The study says MOTS-c helps mice stay healthy and not get fat, but it never measured if they burned more energy or used more sugar like the claim says.