descriptive
Analysis v1
0
Pro
13
Against

MOTS-c didn’t make mice move more, so its effects on weight and metabolism aren’t just because they were exercising more.

Scientific Claim

In mice, MOTS-c treatment did not alter total physical activity levels, indicating that its metabolic effects are not secondary to increased movement.

Original Statement

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

appropriately stated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

association

Can only show association/correlation

Assessment Explanation

The claim is a simple descriptive observation with no causal implication. The language is appropriate for the evidence.

More Accurate Statement

In mice, MOTS-c treatment was associated with no change in total physical activity levels, indicating that its metabolic effects are not secondary to increased movement.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (0)

0
No supporting evidence found

Contradicting (1)

13

The study shows MOTS-c helps mice stay healthy and not get fat, but it never checked if the mice moved more or less, so we can't say if the health benefits are because they moved more or not.