Neanderthal isotopic data may reflect a diet that included stored animal carcasses infested with maggots, because these maggots provided both high-protein and high-fat nutrients, helping hominins...
Mechanism
Synthesis from 1 study
When meat rots, bacteria remove light nitrogen atoms, leaving behind heavy ones. Maggots eating that rotting meat soak up the heavy nitrogen, and when humans eat the maggots along with the fat-rich meat, that heavy nitrogen ends up in their bones. This explains why Neanderthal bones show high...
Most probable mechanism
When animal tissue starts to rot, bacteria break down proteins and release lighter nitrogen atoms into the air, leaving behind heavier nitrogen atoms in the leftover goo. Flies lay eggs in this rotting meat, and the baby flies (maggots) eat the goo, absorbing the heavy nitrogen into their own bodies. When humans eat these maggot-filled tissues, the heavy nitrogen gets stored in their bones, making their isotopic signature look like they ate a lot of high-protein food—even though they were actually eating fat-rich, rotting meat with lots of maggots.
Microbial decomposition of animal tissue preferentially releases lighter nitrogen isotopes (14N) as volatile compounds, enriching the remaining substrate in heavier nitrogen isotopes (15N).
Fly larvae consume the 15N-enriched decomposing tissue and nutrient-rich fluids, incorporating the heavy nitrogen isotopes into their own proteins during growth.
Consumption of maggot-infested tissue by hominins introduces the 15N-enriched larval biomass into the diet, leading to elevated nitrogen isotope ratios in consumer tissues such as bone collagen.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Community contributions welcome
Neanderthals, hypercarnivores, and maggots: Insights from stable nitrogen isotopes
Contradicting (0)
Community contributions welcome
Gold Standard Evidence Needed
According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.