View

The Study

Neanderthals, hypercarnivores, and maggots: Insights from stable nitrogen isotopes

In simple terms

This study found that maggots that eat rotting meat have super high levels of a special nitrogen type. It guesses that maybe Neanderthals ate these maggots, which could explain why their bones show the same high levels. But it didn’t prove Neanderthals actually ate them—it’s just a cool idea.

44%

Analysis score

44/ 44

Maximum 44 for a cross-sectional study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology40
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Cross-Sectional Study
Level 4 - Case series
What’s the bottom line?

Neanderthals had super high nitrogen levels in their bones, which scientists thought meant they ate a lot of meat. But this study shows that maggots eating rotting meat have even higher nitrogen levels—and people in cold regions have eaten these maggots for thousands of years.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cross-Sectional & Case Series
Level 4
44

44 / 100

Quality score

Snapshots of a population at a single point in time, or descriptions of small groups. Can identify correlations and prevalence, but cannot determine cause and effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes—this means Neanderthals could have gotten their high nitrogen levels by eating fat-rich maggots from spoiled meat, not by eating huge amounts of lean meat that would have poisoned them.
  2. 2Maggots had nitrogen levels from 5.4‰ to 43.2‰, while rotting meat only went up to 7.7‰.
  3. 3Humans can't safely eat more than 300g of protein per day, but maggots give both protein and fat.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Science Advances

Year

2025

Authors

Melanie M Beasley, Julie J Lesnik, John D. Speth

Open Access
8 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (10)

Assertion

Throughout most of human evolutionary history, the diet of early human ancestors consisted mainly of animal-based foods, with meat being the main source of nutrition.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Between 1.2 million and a few hundred thousand years ago, early human ancestors like Homo and Neanderthals relied mainly on meat and other animal foods for nutrition, while earlier ancestors like Australopithecus ate mostly plants.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Fly larvae that feed on decomposing human muscle tissue have unusually high levels of a specific nitrogen isotope compared to herbivores and carnivores. If early humans ate these larvae, their own isotopic signature could show a similar elevation.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

Neanderthal isotopic data may reflect a diet that included stored animal carcasses infested with maggots, because these maggots provided both high-protein and high-fat nutrients, helping hominins avoid the harmful effects of consuming too much lean protein.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

Historical records show that Indigenous peoples in the Arctic and subarctic regularly ate fly larvae found in decaying animal matter because they valued them as a nutritious food, not because they had no other options.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Fly larvae that feed on decaying human muscle tissue have unusually high levels of a nitrogen isotope called δ¹⁵N. If humans consume these larvae, their own δ¹⁵N levels may rise significantly, even without eating large amounts of meat.

Causal
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.