One study looked at whether eating more unsaturated fat compared to saturated fat helps the heart — and found no link, even though other research has suggested it might.
Scientific Claim
The ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fat (P:S ratio) was not significantly associated with coronary heart disease risk in the single study that evaluated it, despite prior evidence suggesting a protective effect at higher ratios.
Original Statement
“Only 1 of the 21 studies that met criteria for inclusion in this meta-analysis evaluated the relation of the P:S ratio with CHD (14). No effect was seen in this study, in which the average P:S ratio was ≈0.4, nor was there an association of P:S ratio with CVD in the Israeli Ischemic Heart Study (U Goldbourt, personal communication, 2008).”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
association
Can only show association/correlation
Assessment Explanation
The claim accurately reflects the study’s own admission of limited data on P:S ratio and avoids overinterpreting the single null result. Language is appropriately cautious.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (0)
Contradicting (1)
Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies evaluating the association of saturated fat with cardiovascular disease
This study looked at whether eating more saturated fat causes heart disease, and found no strong link—but it didn’t look at the ratio of healthy fats to saturated fats, which is what the claim is about.