During bench press exercises performed to failure at 70% of one-repetition maximum, the greater total volume lifted with velocity-based training is partly due to a higher reliance on aerobic energy...
Mechanism
Synthesis from 1 study
Lifting faster makes your muscles need energy quicker, so your body uses more oxygen to keep making that energy. This lets you do more reps before getting tired, even though you're not lifting longer. The evidence shows this oxygen boost is why you can lift more total weight.
Most probable mechanism
When you lift the bar faster, your muscles need energy more quickly. Your body can't make enough energy without oxygen fast enough at first, so it starts using more oxygen to keep making energy. This lets you do more reps before you get too tired, even though you're not spending more time lifting.
Maximal concentric velocity during each repetition increases the rate of muscle contraction and power output, elevating the immediate energy demand per unit time.
The increased power output and repetition rate elevate the demand for ATP regeneration beyond the capacity of immediate anaerobic stores, requiring faster oxygen delivery to mitochondria.
Increased oxygen delivery and utilization shift the relative energy contribution from anaerobic to aerobic metabolism, sustaining ATP production over a longer duration without accumulating metabolic fatigue from lactate or H+.
Sustained aerobic ATP production allows more repetitions to be completed before fatigue limits performance, increasing total volume load without increasing time under tension.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
Community contributions welcome
Bench-Press Performed With a Velocity- and Tempo-Based Approach: Are There Differences in Volume Load, Time Under Tension, and Metabolic Demands?
Contradicting (0)
Community contributions welcome
Gold Standard Evidence Needed
According to GRADE and EBM methodology, here is what ideal scientific evidence would look like to definitively prove or disprove this specific claim, ordered from strongest to weakest evidence.