There are only a few small, short studies on this topic, and many didn’t even track whether people stuck to their workout plans — so we can’t trust the results very much.
Scientific Claim
Current evidence on muscle fiber hypertrophy from low-load and high-load resistance training is based on only five studies with small sample sizes (median n=17), short durations (6–12 weeks), and inconsistent reporting of training adherence, limiting confidence in the results.
Original Statement
“Five studies, with a total of 10 study groups were included in the review... Study samples ranged from 14 to 49 participants (median: 17 participants)... adherence to the training programs was reported only in one study.”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
appropriately stated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
association
Can only show association/correlation
Assessment Explanation
The claim describes methodological constraints of the included studies, not an inferred effect. The authors accurately report these limitations, and the language appropriately reflects evidence quality, not causal inference.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
The Effects of Low-Load Vs. High-Load Resistance Training on Muscle Fiber Hypertrophy: A Meta-Analysis
This study found that we don’t have enough solid proof yet to say whether light or heavy weights are better for muscle growth, because the existing studies are few and not very consistent.