correlational
Analysis v1
33
Pro
0
Against

When people get both a visual target and a gentle push from the robot at the same time, they hit the target more accurately and with less muscle strain than when they get only one kind of cue.

Scientific Claim

In healthy adults, combined visual-force feedback during unilateral active training is associated with the lowest tracking error (6.6 ± 0.8 mm) and lowest muscle activation (0.53 ± 0.13) during circular tasks, suggesting that multimodal feedback may optimize movement precision while reducing muscular effort.

Original Statement

UAT with multi-modality (visual-force) feedback (TE: 6.6 ± 0.8 mm; activation level: 0.53 ± 0.13) (p < 0.01).

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

overstated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

association

Can only show association/correlation

Assessment Explanation

The authors imply this is an 'optimal strategy' for clinical use, but the study only involved healthy adults. The verb should reflect association, not clinical optimization.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (1)

33

The study found that when people moved their arm in circles with both visual and force feedback together, they made fewer mistakes and used less muscle effort than when they got only one type of feedback — exactly what the claim says.

Contradicting (0)

0
No contradicting evidence found