When people get both a visual target and a gentle push from the robot at the same time, they hit the target more accurately and with less muscle strain than when they get only one kind of cue.
Scientific Claim
In healthy adults, combined visual-force feedback during unilateral active training is associated with the lowest tracking error (6.6 ± 0.8 mm) and lowest muscle activation (0.53 ± 0.13) during circular tasks, suggesting that multimodal feedback may optimize movement precision while reducing muscular effort.
Original Statement
“UAT with multi-modality (visual-force) feedback (TE: 6.6 ± 0.8 mm; activation level: 0.53 ± 0.13) (p < 0.01).”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
overstated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
association
Can only show association/correlation
Assessment Explanation
The authors imply this is an 'optimal strategy' for clinical use, but the study only involved healthy adults. The verb should reflect association, not clinical optimization.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
The study found that when people moved their arm in circles with both visual and force feedback together, they made fewer mistakes and used less muscle effort than when they got only one type of feedback — exactly what the claim says.