When healthy people move their arm with a robot using just one kind of feedback (like seeing a target or feeling resistance), they make more mistakes and use more muscle effort than when they get both kinds of feedback at once.
Scientific Claim
In healthy adults, unilateral active training with single-modality visual or force feedback is associated with higher tracking error (22.5 ± 3.40 mm) and greater muscle activation (0.78 ± 0.12) than training with combined visual-force feedback (TE: 6.6 ± 0.8 mm; activation: 0.53 ± 0.13) during circular tasks, indicating that simpler feedback may increase effort and error but not necessarily improve accuracy.
Original Statement
“UAT with single-modality feedback (visual/force) enabled higher TE (22.5 ± 3.40 mm) and active participation (0.78 ± 0.12) when compared with UAT with multi-modality (visual-force) feedback (TE: 6.6 ± 0.8 mm; activation level: 0.53 ± 0.13) (p < 0.01).”
Evidence Quality Assessment
Claim Status
overstated
Study Design Support
Design supports claim
Appropriate Language Strength
association
Can only show association/correlation
Assessment Explanation
The authors use 'enabled higher' implying causation, but the study design (observational, healthy subjects) only supports association. The verb should reflect correlation, not effect.
Evidence from Studies
Supporting (1)
When people practiced moving their arm with just one type of feedback (like only seeing a screen), they made more mistakes and used more muscle effort than when they got both visual and force feedback together — meaning two types of help made them move better and easier.