correlational
Analysis v1
0
Pro
33
Against

When people try to move their arm with a robot and can’t see or feel where they’re supposed to go, they miss the target by a lot—much more than when they get visual or force cues.

Scientific Claim

In healthy adults, unilateral active training with no feedback is associated with substantially higher tracking error (63.5 ± 10.0 mm) during circular tasks compared to all feedback conditions, demonstrating that sensory feedback is critical for accurate movement control during active robot-assisted tasks.

Original Statement

UAT-Circular-None: TE 63.5 ± 10.0 mm vs. UAT-Circular-Visual: 11.8 ± 1.1 mm, UAT-Circular-Force: 22.5 ± 3.4 mm, UAT-Circular-Visual-force: 6.6 ± 0.8 mm (p < 0.01).

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

overstated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

association

Can only show association/correlation

Assessment Explanation

The authors imply feedback 'improves effectiveness' in clinical contexts, but the study only tested healthy adults. The verb should reflect association, not clinical benefit.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (0)

0
No supporting evidence found

Contradicting (1)

33

The study found that even without feedback, people didn’t make huge errors — only about 22 mm — not the 63.5 mm the claim says. Also, more feedback helped them do even better, so feedback matters, but the claim got the numbers and details wrong.