correlational
Analysis v1
33
Pro
0
Against

When people use a robot to move their arm along a curved or wiggly path instead of a straight line, their muscles work harder and they make more mistakes, no matter if the robot moves their arm or they move it themselves.

Scientific Claim

In healthy adults, complex virtual tasks (circular and S-shaped) are associated with significantly higher tracking error, interactive force, and muscle activation compared to simple straight-line tasks during both passive and active robot-assisted training, suggesting task complexity increases motor demand regardless of training mode.

Original Statement

The relatively complex circular and S-shaped tasks significantly enhanced the benefits of various training strategies.

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

overstated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

association

Can only show association/correlation

Assessment Explanation

The authors use 'enhanced the benefits' implying therapeutic gain, but the study only measured motor metrics in healthy adults. The verb should reflect association, not benefit.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (1)

33

The study found that when people moved their arms along curvy paths (circles and S-shapes) instead of straight lines during robot training, their muscles worked harder and they made more mistakes—meaning harder tasks make your body work more, no matter if the robot is moving for you or you’re moving yourself.

Contradicting (0)

0
No contradicting evidence found