quantitative
Analysis v1
0
Pro
10
Against

When the first step of energy production is blocked, methylene blue can help mitochondria make energy again—but when the second step is blocked, it can't help at all.

Scientific Claim

In mouse brain mitochondria, methylene blue (1 μM) partially restores respiration inhibited by rotenone (Complex I blockade), increasing oxygen consumption from 1.95 ± 0.6 to 21 ± 3.2 nmol/min/mg, but has minimal effect on respiration inhibited by antimycin (15.6 ± 4.9 to 20.2 ± 6.1 nmol/min/mg), confirming its ability to bypass Complex I but not Complex III.

Original Statement

Adding 1 μM MB partially restored the rate of mitochondrial respiration to 21 ± 3.2 nmol/min/mg... MB had very little effect on the rate of mitochondria respiration (20.2 ± 6.1 nmol/min/mg) [after antimycin].

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

appropriately stated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

definitive

Can make definitive causal claims

Assessment Explanation

The study reports precise, statistically significant (p<0.05) oxygen consumption values from n=4 independent experiments under controlled conditions. The numbers directly support definitive claims about the magnitude of effect.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (0)

0
No supporting evidence found

Contradicting (1)

10

The study shows that methylene blue can’t fix energy production when Complex III is blocked, even though it can help when Complex I is blocked — so it doesn’t work around both problems like the claim suggests.