mechanistic
Analysis v1
0
Pro
66
Against

Whey protein made muscles grow faster, but it didn’t turn on the usual ‘growth switches’ in the cells—meaning it must be working through a different, unknown way.

Scientific Claim

In healthy older women, the muscle protein synthetic response to whey protein is not dependent on acute changes in mTOR pathway phosphorylation, suggesting alternative or downstream mechanisms drive its anabolic effect.

Original Statement

There were no significant differences between supplemental groups in any target measured for changes in phosphorylation status (P > 0.05). Phosphorylation of p-4EBP1 Thr37/46 was significantly reduced from Baseline but not different from Rest in Exercise (P = 0.027), and phosphorylation of p-AKT Ser473 and p-mTOR Ser2448 were significantly reduced from Baseline in response to feeding but not different than Baseline with Exercise (P = 0.006 and P = 0.017, respectively).

Evidence Quality Assessment

Claim Status

appropriately stated

Study Design Support

Design supports claim

Appropriate Language Strength

definitive

Can make definitive causal claims

Assessment Explanation

The study directly measured signaling proteins and found no significant changes. The claim correctly interprets the absence of effect as evidence for alternative mechanisms, which is logically supported.

Evidence from Studies

Supporting (0)

0
No supporting evidence found

Contradicting (1)

66

The study shows whey protein helps older women build muscle better than collagen, but it didn’t check the internal body signals (like mTOR) that might explain why—so we can’t say if the claim about those signals is right or wrong.