View

The Study

Effect of multivitamin‐mineral supplementation on change in cognitive function in the COSMOS Clinical subcohort and meta‐analysis of COSMOS cognition studies

In simple terms

This study looked at several big experiments where people took vitamins or fake pills and then got their brains tested. It found that people who took vitamins might have remembered things a little better, but we can’t be totally sure because we didn’t see all the details of how the experiments were done.

44%

Analysis score

44/ 85

Maximum 85 for a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology13
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Level 2a - Systematic review of cohort studies
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists gave older people daily multivitamins or fake pills for two years and tested their memory and thinking skills.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Reviews of Cohort Studies
Level 2a
44

44 / 100

Quality score

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cohort studies. They sit above a single cohort study but below a single randomized trial, because the underlying evidence is still observational.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1The memory improvement is small — like remembering one extra word out of 10 after two years — but it suggests vitamins might slow memory loss a bit.
  2. 2People who took vitamins had a tiny but real improvement in memory (0.11 standard deviations).
  3. 3Their overall thinking improved a little too, but not enough to be sure it wasn't by chance (0.06 standard deviations).

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Alzheimer's & Dementia

Year

2023

Authors

Chirag M. Vyas, P. Rist, H. Sesso, Joann E Manson, Olivia I. Okereke

Open Access
Analysis v6

Related Content

Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.