View

The Study

The Effect of PCSK9 Inhibitors on LDL-C Target Achievement in Patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

In simple terms

This study is like looking back at medical records to see what happened to 28 patients with a rare cholesterol condition after they started a new drug. It can tell us what was observed, but it can't prove the drug caused the results because other treatments and factors might have played a role.

33%

Analysis score

33/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology16
Publication100
Statistical31
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

Doctors gave special cholesterol drugs (PCSK9 inhibitors) to kids and young adults with a rare, severe form of high cholesterol to see if it helped lower their levels enough.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
33

33 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1The drug doesn’t help most of these patients much, especially those with the worst genetic form.
  2. 2Staying on it for over a year without benefit may waste time and money.
  3. 3On average, cholesterol went down by less than 9%.
  4. 47 out of 10 didn’t even get the minimum benefit.
  5. 5None reached the safe cholesterol level.
  6. 6If their body couldn’t make working cholesterol receptors, the drug barely worked (-5%).
  7. 7If they had partly working receptors, it worked better (-20%).

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Advances in Therapy

Year

2024

Authors

Awad Alshahrani, Naji Kholaif, Mutaz Al-khnifsawi, Hawazen A. Zarif, Moeber M. Mahzari

Open Access
7 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

Adding PCSK9 drugs to cholesterol-lowering statins can slash bad cholesterol by as much as 81% in people with high cholesterol.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

For people with a rare cholesterol condition called HoFH who are already on cholesterol meds, adding a newer drug (PCSK9 inhibitor) barely lowers bad cholesterol for most — and 7 out of 10 don’t get enough benefit to keep taking it.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

People with a rare genetic form of high cholesterol caused by two broken copies of the LDLR gene don’t get much benefit from PCSK9 inhibitor drugs — most see almost no drop in their bad cholesterol.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Assertion

People with a rare cholesterol condition stayed on a pricey cholesterol drug for about a year on average, even though it didn’t help much — doctors might just keep prescribing it because they’re hesitant to stop treatments that aren’t working.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

Even when people with a rare genetic cholesterol disorder take powerful new drugs called PCSK9 inhibitors along with their usual treatments, none of them got their bad cholesterol down to the recommended healthy levels.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

People with a rare genetic cholesterol disorder who still have a little bit of working cholesterol-cleaning system in their body tend to respond better to a certain type of cholesterol drug, lowering their bad cholesterol by about 20% on average.

Quantitative
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.