View

The Study

The Role of Beef for the Lowest Cost and Adequate Provision of Bioavailable Nutrients in Modeled Diets at a Population Level in the United States

In simple terms

This study is like a math puzzle where scientists used a computer to figure out the cheapest way to get all the nutrients people need. It doesn't test real people or diets — it just shows what the computer thinks would work best based on the rules they gave it.

0%

Analysis score

0/ 0

Maximum 0 for a computational/algorithm study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology0
Publication100
Statistical0
Study type (basis of the score)
Computational/Algorithm Study
Level 5 - Expert opinion
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists used math to find the cheapest way to eat all the right nutrients. They found that beef and other animal foods often give the best nutrients for the least money, especially when you consider how well your body can use them.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Expert Opinion
Level 5
0

0 / 100

Quality score

Based on clinical experience or non-systematic literature reviews. The lowest level of evidence as they are most susceptible to bias and personal perspective.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1This means that even if plant foods have nutrients, your body might not absorb them well, making animal foods more effective and sometimes cheaper for good health.
  2. 2Beef helped meet needs for protein, B-12, and zinc at low cost.
  3. 3Diets considering nutrient absorption cost $1.75–$7.80/day.
  4. 4For women 19–50, no cheap diet could meet iron and zinc needs.
  5. 5Using bioavailability raised diet costs by 50–89%.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Current Developments in Nutrition

Year

2025

Authors

Sylvia M. S. Chungchunlam, Paul J. Moughan

Open Access
1 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.