View

The Study

Sucralose consumption modifies glucose homeostasis, gut microbiota, Curli protein, and related metabolites in healthy individuals: a randomized placebo-controlled, triple-blind trial.

In simple terms

This study gave some people sugar-free sweetener and others a fake one, then checked if their blood sugar changed. Because they randomly picked who got what, we can guess the sweetener might have caused the change — but we don’t have all the numbers, so we can’t be 100% sure.

53%

Analysis score

53/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology56
Publication100
Statistical54
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists gave healthy people a common artificial sweetener called sucralose every day for a month to see what it did to their body.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
53

53 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — a 20% drop in insulin sensitivity means the body has a harder time using insulin to control blood sugar, which could increase diabetes risk over time.
  2. 2After a month, their insulin sensitivity dropped by 20.3%, their blood sugar and insulin spiked higher after meals, their gut bacteria became less diverse, and their body showed more signs of inflammation.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Clinical nutrition ESPEN

Year

2025

Authors

A. Romo-Romo, M. Sánchez-Tapia, M. López-Carrasco, L. E. Guillén-Pineda, G. Brito-Córdova, Alexandro J. Martagon, Omar Granados Portillo, G. Walther, F. Gómez-Pérez, C. A. Aguilar-Salinas, A. Tovar, Nimbe Torres, Paloma Almeda-Valdés

5 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.