Study analysis · The Journal of biological chemistry · 1979

These two hormones turn your liver into a sugar factory—without using the signal everyone thought was essential.

Two hormones, angiotensin II and vasopressin, make your liver release more sugar by flipping a calcium switch, not the usual cAMP switch that glucagon uses.

Reading level
Very low certainty
Level 3b · Individual case-control studyAssociation, not causationNo causal claims

Overview

What the study found

The study in plain English — the bottom line, every takeaway we extracted, and what to do with them.

In simple terms

This study looked at how certain hormones affect tiny parts inside liver cells in a test tube. It shows a possible way they might work, but it doesn't prove this happens in people or causes any real health effects.

What’s the bottom line?

Two hormones, angiotensin II and vasopressin, tell the liver to make more sugar by changing how certain enzymes are tagged, without using the usual sugar-making signal. Glucagon does the same thing but uses a different signal.

How strong is this study?

The scientists did a careful job inside the lab with the cells they had, but we don't know how they picked the cells or if anything else messed up the results. That means we can't fully trust that this is how things work in real life.

Reporting

0 / 100

  • COI disclosureconflicts of interest not disclosed
  • Data availabilitydata not shared
  • Code availabilitycode not shared
Methodology

19 / 100

  • Randomizationrandomization unclear
  • Blindingblinding unclear
  • Control group+15/15
  • Sample sizeno sample size reported
  • Follow-upno follow-up reported
Publication

100 / 100

Statistical

31 / 100

  • P-valuesno p-values reported
  • Effect size+20/20
  • Confidence intervalsno confidence intervals
  • Pre-registrationnot pre-registered

Each component is scored out of 100 and then capped by the study design — a case series cannot reach the ceiling a randomised trial can, however well it is reported.

Where it sits

RCT reviews

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Case-Control Studies
Level 3b
34

34 / 100

Probability of being correct

Researchers compare people who have a condition (cases) with similar people who do not (controls), looking back in time for differences in exposure. Useful but more prone to bias.

This design cannot establish causation — the findings describe an association, not a cause. Study is in vitro and lacks randomization, control group details, and human participants; cannot establish causation without explicit experimental design evidence.

No Conflicts

No conflicts of interest identified

No conflicts of interest or funding information were disclosed in the provided text.

The study describes mechanistic biochemical findings without any disclosure of funding, author affiliations, or conflicts of interest. No industry ties or funder involvement can be inferred from the provided text.

Key takeaways

  1. 01

    Angiotensin II and vasopressin increased phosphorylase activity by 250–260%, decreased glycogen synthase activity by 50%, and decreased pyruvate kinase activity by 30–70%.

  2. 02

    These changes only happened when calcium was present.

  3. 03

    Yes — these changes mean the liver produces more glucose and stores less, which could raise blood sugar levels — important for understanding how stress or dehydration might trigger high blood sugar.

Surprising findings

  • Angiotensin II and vasopressin trigger the exact same enzyme changes as glucagon—but without using cAMP.For decades, glucagon’s cAMP pathway was considered the primary route for liver glucose release. Finding that two other hormones bypass it entirely and use calcium instead contradicts textbook models.

Practical takeaways

If you're prone to high blood sugar during stress or dehydration, staying hydrated and managing stress may help reduce unintended glucose spikes.

This study was done on isolated liver cells in a lab—no human trials were conducted. The real-world impact is still theoretical.

low confidence

Why this study matters

Calcium vs. cAMP: The Hidden Sugar Switch

Angiotensin II and vasopressin increase phosphorylation of 10–12 liver proteins—including phosphorylase, glycogen synthase, and pyruvate kinase—without changing cAMP levels. Glucagon does the same thing, but only by boosting cAMP. When calcium is removed, angiotensin II and vasopressin lose all effect, but glucagon still works.

This reveals a completely different biological pathway for controlling blood sugar—one that doesn’t rely on the well-known cAMP signal. It suggests stress or dehydration (which trigger these hormones) might spike blood sugar in ways we didn’t fully understand.

260% Sugar Boost—No cAMP Needed

Angiotensin II and vasopressin increased phosphorylase activity by 250–260%, decreased glycogen synthase by 50%, and reduced pyruvate kinase by 30–70%. These changes directly link to increased glucose production and reduced storage. All of this happened without any measurable change in cAMP.

It’s shocking that such a massive metabolic shift can happen without the body’s most famous sugar-regulating signal. This could explain why some people with normal insulin levels still get high blood sugar under stress.

The Calcium Lock: Why Removing It Erases the Effect

When hepatocytes were placed in calcium-free medium, angiotensin II and vasopressin lost all ability to trigger enzyme phosphorylation or activity changes. Glucagon’s effects remained unchanged. This proves calcium is essential for this pathway.

It’s rare to see such a clean on/off switch in biology. This could lead to new ways to block stress-induced blood sugar spikes without touching insulin or cAMP.

Want the whole report?

Detailed mode opens the full scientific breakdown — every score component, the methodology, conflicts of interest, the evidence analysis behind each claim, and the raw study data.

Standing

Who’s using this study?

The videos and claims on this site that lean on this study, and the researchers who wrote it.

1 video from Thomas DeLauer cite this study, drawing 1 claim from it.

Thomas DeLauer
Supports
All 1 video reference this study through extracted claims.

Authored by

4 researchers

If this is your work, this is how we attribute it on Fit Body Science. James C. Garrison is listed as the lead author.