View

The Study

Smoking aggravates neovascular age-related macular degeneration via Sema4D-PlexinB1 axis-mediated activation of pericytes

In simple terms

This study found that people who smoke tend to have worse eye damage from AMD, and in mice, it showed how smoking might make a specific protein cause trouble in eye blood vessels. But it didn’t prove smoking directly causes the damage — it just shows they often happen together.

58%

Analysis score

58/ 58

Maximum 58 for a case-control study.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology41
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Case-Control Study
Level 3b - Individual case-control study
What’s the bottom line?

Smoking makes a common blind-causing eye disease worse by sending immune cells that activate support cells in the eye, causing leaky blood vessels. Blocking a specific signal between these cells stops the damage.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Case-Control Studies
Level 3b
58

58 / 100

Quality score

Researchers compare people who have a condition (cases) with similar people who do not (controls), looking back in time for differences in exposure. Useful but more prone to bias.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes — this means smokers get less benefit from current eye shots, but a new treatment targeting this pathway could help them see better when used together.
  2. 2Smokers had 2x higher retinal thickness after anti-VEGF treatment.
  3. 3In mice, blocking Sema4D reduced abnormal blood vessels as much as anti-VEGF, and combining both cut lesions in half more than either alone.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Nature Communications

Year

2025

Authors

Kai He, Xue Dong, Tianjing Yang, Ziqi Li, Yuming Liu, Jing He, Meng Wu, Selena Wei-Zhang, Parhat Kaysar, B. Cui, Xu Yao, Li Zhang, Wei Zhou, Heping Xu, Jun Wei, Qiang Liu, Junhao Hu, Xiaohong Wang, Hua Yan

Open Access
11 citations
Analysis v6

Related Content

Claims (7)

Assertion

People who smoke cigarettes have twice the risk of developing age-related macular degeneration due to oxidative damage and reduced blood flow to the retina.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

People with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who smoke have thicker retinas and larger lesions after three anti-VEGF treatments than non-smokers with the same condition.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

In mice, smoking raises Sema4D levels on certain immune cells, which bind to receptors on blood vessel support cells in the eye, causing those support cells to activate and destabilize blood vessels, resulting in larger abnormal blood vessel growth in the choroid.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

Blocking Sema4D in mice with abnormal blood vessel growth in the eye reduces the size of the lesions and leakage from blood vessels as effectively as anti-VEGF treatment, and using both treatments together reduces them more than either treatment alone.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

In cells of the eye called choroidal pericytes, the protein ROR2 is necessary for activating a signaling pathway involving PlexinB1 and RhoA that contributes to abnormal blood vessel growth in neovascular AMD.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Assertion

In individuals with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and in mice exposed to smoke, choroidal pericytes show elevated levels of fibroblast and contractile proteins, which are associated with blood vessel instability and tissue scarring.

Mechanistic
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.