View

The Study

Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease

In simple terms

This study is like a fair test where half the people got the real medicine and half got a fake one, and nobody knew who got what. It shows that the medicine really does lower bad cholesterol and helps prevent heart attacks and strokes in people who already have heart disease.

74%

Analysis score

74/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology100
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Some people with heart disease take cholesterol pills but still have high cholesterol. This study tested adding a special shot (evolocumab) to their pills to see if it helps prevent heart attacks and strokes.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
74

74 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes, the result is important — even small reductions in heart events matter for high-risk patients, and lowering cholesterol further helps, even when levels are already low.
  2. 2Out of 27,564 people: the shot cut bad cholesterol by 59%, reduced heart problems by 15%, and strokes/heart attacks/deaths by 20%.
  3. 3Only side: slightly more soreness at the injection site.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

The New England Journal of Medicine

Year

2017

Authors

M. Sabatine, R. Giugliano, A. Keech, Narimon Honarpour, S. Wiviott, S. Murphy, J. Kuder, Huei Wang, Thomas Liu, S. Wasserman, P. Sever, T. Pedersen

Open Access
4822 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.