View

The Study

The uniquely human capacity to throw evolved from a non-throwing primate: an evolutionary dissociation between action and perception

In simple terms

This study watched monkeys react to people pretending to throw things. It found that monkeys get scared when someone throws like they mean it—but not when someone just waves their arm. That means monkeys can tell the difference between a real throw and a fake one, but it doesn't prove they understand why or how throwing works.

12%

Analysis score

12/ 58

Maximum 58 for a case-control study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology21
Publication100
Statistical54
Study type (basis of the score)
Case-Control Study
Level 3b - Individual case-control study
What’s the bottom line?

Monkeys don’t throw, but they know when a human is about to throw something dangerous—like a rock—and they run away. They don’t care if it’s overhand or underhand, but they do care if the person is looking at them, if there’s a rock, or if it’s thrown slowly.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Case-Control Studies
Level 3b
12

12 / 100

Quality score

Researchers compare people who have a condition (cases) with similar people who do not (controls), looking back in time for differences in exposure. Useful but more prone to bias.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Yes—this suggests humans didn’t need to evolve new brain parts to understand throwing; our ancestors may have used existing skills to recognize threats.
  2. 285% ran away from fast throws with rocks; only 15% ran when the hand was empty; 20% ran when the thrower looked away.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Biology Letters

Year

2007

Authors

Justin N. Wood, David D. Glynn, M. Hauser

Open Access
28 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.