View

The Study

The effect of High-Dose Vitamin C Treatment for Acute Respiratory Failure Due to Coronavirus Disease Pneumonia on Mortality and Length of Intensive Care Stay: A Retrospective Cohort Study

In simple terms

This study looked at sick people in the hospital who got vitamin C and those who didn’t, and saw if they got better faster. But the doctors decided who got vitamin C, not a random flip of a coin, so maybe the people who got it were just a little healthier to begin with. That means we can’t say vitamin C definitely helped or hurt — we can only say it might be linked to some small changes in blood tests.

53%

Analysis score

53/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology39
Publication100
Statistical46
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

Doctors gave very high doses of vitamin C through an IV to sick COVID patients in the ICU to see if it helped them live longer or leave the hospital sooner.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
53

53 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1Even though inflammation markers improved, patients didn't live longer, leave the ICU sooner, or need less breathing support — so the lab improvements didn't translate to real benefits.
  2. 2Vitamin C didn't lower death rates (44% died vs.
  3. 360% without it), didn't shorten ICU stays (10 days both groups), and didn't reduce need for breathing machines (74% vs.
  4. 475%).
  5. 5But it did help lower inflammation markers: SOFA score rose less, CRP and ferritin went down.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital

Year

2023

Authors

N. Çoşkun, Mustafa Altınay, H. Turk, Nebia Peker, Serkan İslamoğlu, Ayşe Surhan Çınar, Melis Ozkan

Open Access
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

In critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and breathing failure, receiving high-dose intravenous vitamin C for four days did not reduce the chance of dying within 28 days or shorten the time spent in the ICU, even though some blood markers improved.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

In critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, intravenous vitamin C at 6 grams per day for four days was associated with a smaller rise in organ dysfunction scores and a modest drop in ferritin levels compared to patients who did not receive it.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

In patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, intravenous vitamin C at 6 grams per day for four days was associated with lower increases in two markers of inflammation—C-reactive protein and procalcitonin—compared to patients who did not receive it.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

In patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, receiving high-dose intravenous vitamin C for four days did not significantly reduce the need for breathing machines or blood pressure medications compared to those who did not receive it.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

In critically ill patients, high-dose intravenous vitamin C is associated with higher rates of death and organ failure.

Causal
Read analysis
Assertion

In patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, receiving high-dose intravenous vitamin C for four days resulted in a 31% improvement in oxygenation levels, compared to a 20% improvement in those who did not receive it, without reducing the need for mechanical ventilation.

Correlational
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.