View

The Study

Effect of multivitamin-mineral supplementation versus placebo on cognitive function: Results from the clinic sub-cohort of the COSMOS randomized clinical trial and meta-analysis of three cognitive studies within COSMOS.

In simple terms

This study looked at lots of older people who took daily vitamins or fake pills (placebo) and then tested their memory and thinking. It found that those who took vitamins might have had a little better memory after two years — but we can't be 100% sure because we didn’t see the full study details.

52%

Analysis score

52/ 100

Maximum 100 for a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology36
Publication100
Statistical77
Study type (basis of the score)
Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Level 1a - Systematic review of RCTs
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists gave older adults daily vitamin pills for two years and checked their memory and thinking skills.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)
Level 1a
52

52 / 100

Quality score

The highest quality evidence. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses that pool randomized controlled trials, giving the most reliable summary of experimental evidence.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1The improvement is small but statistically meaningful — like being 2 years younger in brain age, which could matter over time.
  2. 2People who took vitamins had slightly better memory (0.12 points better in one group, 0.06 in another) and slightly better overall thinking (0.07 points).
  3. 3Their thinking was like someone 2 years younger.
  4. 4No improvement in focus or planning.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

The American journal of clinical nutrition

Year

2023

Authors

Chirag M. Vyas, J. Manson, H. Sesso, Nancy R. Cook, P. Rist, Alison Weinberg, M. V. Moorthy, Laura D. Baker, M. Espeland, Lok-Kin Yeung, A. Brickman, Olivia I. Okereke

Open Access
22 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.