View

The Study

Cyclocreatine transport and cytotoxicity in rat glioma and human ovarian carcinoma cells: 31P-NMR spectroscopy.

In simple terms

This study looked at cancer cells in a dish, not in animals or people. It shows what happened when they added a chemical, but we can't say for sure that the chemical caused the changes — it just shows a pattern in these cells.

6%

Analysis score

6/ 44

Maximum 44 for a cross-sectional study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology0
Publication100
Statistical0
Study type (basis of the score)
Cross-Sectional Study
Level 4 - Case series
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists tested a drug called cyclocreatine on two types of cancer cells to see how it stops them from growing.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cross-Sectional & Case Series
Level 4
6

6 / 100

Quality score

Snapshots of a population at a single point in time, or descriptions of small groups. Can identify correlations and prevalence, but cannot determine cause and effect.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1This helps scientists understand how the drug works differently in different cancers, which could help design better treatments.
  2. 2Cyclocreatine stopped both rat brain cancer cells and human ovary cancer cells from growing.
  3. 3The drug built up in one type of cell but not the other.
  4. 4It made the rat cancer cells swell, but not the human ones.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

The American journal of physiology

Year

1996

Authors

Y. Schiffenbauer, G. Meir, M. Cohn, M. Neeman

14 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.