View

The Study

Searching for Primary Predictors of Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer’s Disease: A Multivariate Follow-Up Study

In simple terms

This study is like following a group of kids to see who gets taller. It shows that certain things (like eating a lot) might go along with growing taller, but it can't prove that eating a lot makes you taller. Similarly, this study follows people with memory issues and sees that some markers (brain size, brain waves, drawing tests) often show up in people who get worse, but it doesn't prove those markers cause the decline.

26%

Analysis score

26/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology16
Publication100
Statistical0
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

This study looked at people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to see which tests might predict if they'll develop Alzheimer's disease within two years. They found that combining three measurements—a brain scan of the hippocampus, brain wave activity in the back of the brain, and a simple clock-drawing test—could predict conversion very accurately.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
26

26 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1This result is important because it suggests that a combination of simple, non-invasive tests could help identify which people with MCI are at highest risk of developing Alzheimer's, potentially aiding in early intervention and planning.
  2. 2Out of 33 people with MCI, 12 progressed to Alzheimer's.
  3. 3The three measurements together correctly identified all 12 who progressed (100% sensitivity) and correctly identified nearly all who did not (94.7% specificity).
  4. 4For example, if 21 people were stable, 20 of them were correctly identified as stable.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Year

2016

Authors

M. E. López, A. Turrero, P. Cuesta, D. López-Sanz, R. Bruña, A. Marcos, P. Gil, M. Yus, A. Barabash, J. Cabranes, F. Maestú, Alberto Fernández

54 citations
Analysis v6
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.