View

The Study

Glycine supplementation extends lifespan of male and female mice

In simple terms

This study saw that mice who ate extra glycine lived a little longer and got less lung cancer, but it didn't randomly assign them to groups or hide who got what. So we can't say glycine definitely caused the longer life—maybe something else was different.

16%

Analysis score

16/ 72

Maximum 72 for a cohort study.

Where the score came from

Reporting40
Methodology31
Publication100
Statistical54
Study type (basis of the score)
Cohort Study
Level 2b - Individual cohort study
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists gave mice extra glycine (a harmless amino acid) in their food to see if it helped them live longer and stay healthier.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Cohort Studies
Level 2b
16

16 / 100

Quality score

Groups of people are followed over time to see who develops an outcome. Strong for identifying risk factors and associations, but cannot prove causation as firmly as RCTs.

Cannot establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1The effect is small — like adding a few extra weeks to a human’s 80-year life — but consistent and specific to lung cancer and longevity, not general health.
  2. 2Mice with extra glycine lived 4%-6% longer on average, had 78% fewer lung cancer deaths (2 vs.
  3. 39), and female mice stayed lighter, but no other diseases changed.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Aging Cell

Year

2019

Authors

Richard A. Miller, David E. Harrison, C. M. Astle, Molly A. Bogue, J. Brind, Elizabeth Fernandez, K. Flurkey, M. Javors, W. Ladiges, C. Leeuwenburgh, F. Macchiarini, James F. Nelson, Alexey G. Ryazanov, J. Snyder, T. Stearns, Douglas E. Vaughan, R. Strong

Open Access
80 citations
Analysis v5

Related Content

Claims (6)

Assertion

In mice with genetic variation, a diet containing 8% glycine was linked to fewer deaths from lung cancer compared to a normal diet, with 2 deaths in the glycine group versus 9 in the control group.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

Female mice given 8% glycine in their diet lose 7% to 10% of their body weight between 12 and 24 months of age, while male mice given the same diet do not lose weight.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

In a specific strain of mice, giving aspirin, inulin, or TM5441 starting at 11 months of age does not change how long the mice live on average or at their maximum lifespan.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

In genetically heterogeneous mice, feeding a diet containing 8% glycine for 12 to 24 months is associated with a 4% to 6% longer median lifespan and a 6% longer maximum lifespan in males, and a 2% longer maximum lifespan in females, with consistent results across three separate research laboratories.

Correlational
Read analysis
Assertion

In mice with diverse genetics, a diet containing 8% glycine does not change the rate of 40 common age-related diseases such as tumors and degenerative conditions, but it is associated with longer lifespan and fewer pulmonary adenocarcinomas.

Descriptive
Read analysis
Assertion

In animals, increasing the amount of glycine relative to methionine in the diet reduces the shortening of lifespan that occurs with high methionine intake.

Causal
Read analysis
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.