View

The Study

Effect of oral creatine supplementation on human muscle GLUT4 protein content after immobilization.

In simple terms

This study is like a fair test where people were randomly given either creatine or a fake pill to see how their muscles changed after being inactive and then exercising again. Because it was fair and controlled, we can say creatine probably helped keep a key sugar-handling protein in muscles from dropping.

53%

Analysis score

53/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology78
Publication100
Statistical23
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

When a leg is kept still, muscles can get weaker. This study looked at whether taking creatine helps keep muscles healthy during rest and recovery.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
53

53 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1This means creatine may help muscles stay ready to use sugar during rest and recover faster when training restarts.
  2. 2Creatine stopped muscle sugar transporter (GLUT4) from dropping by 20% during 2 weeks of not moving.
  3. 3After 10 weeks of exercise, creatine helped GLUT4 go up by about 40%.
  4. 4Glycogen and creatine in muscles were higher with supplements after 3 weeks, but not after 10 weeks.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Diabetes

Year

2001

Authors

B. Eijnde, B. Ursø, E. A. Richter, P. Greenhaff, Peter Hespel

Open Access
167 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.