View

The Study

Dose–Response of Creatine Supplementation on Cognitive Function in Healthy Young Adults

In simple terms

This study gave some people creatine pills and others fake pills, then tested their brain power and brain activity. It found no clear difference, so we can't say creatine helps or hurts thinking in young, healthy people. But because only 30 people were tested, we can't be 100% sure — maybe it helps a little, but we didn't see it.

53%

Analysis score

53/ 90

Maximum 90 for a randomized controlled trial.

Where the score came from

Reporting0
Methodology78
Publication100
Statistical23
Study type (basis of the score)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Level 1b - Individual RCT
What’s the bottom line?

Scientists gave young adults creatine pills for six weeks to see if it helped them think faster or remember better, like a brain energy boost.

Where does this study sit?

Reviews of RCTs (Meta-analyses)

Max 100

Randomized Trials

Max 90

Reviews of Cohort Studies

Max 85

Cohort Studies

Max 72

Reviews of Case-Control Studies

Max 63

Case-Control Studies

Max 58

Cross-Sectional & Case Series

Max 50

Expert Opinion

Max 5
StrongerWeaker
Randomized Trials
Level 1b
53

53 / 100

Quality score

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias. The gold standard for testing whether an intervention causes an effect.

Can establish causation

Save studies & get personalized insights

Create a free account to save this study, track new evidence as it comes in, and get breakdowns of studies in the topics you care about.

Key takeaways

Summary

Based on the study abstract and findings.

  1. 1No, the results don't mean creatine helps healthy young adults think better — even though it might make muscles stronger, it doesn't seem to boost brain power in this group.
  2. 2People who took 10 or 20 grams of creatine daily didn't get better at memory, focus, or quick thinking tests.
  3. 3One small hint: those taking 10g showed slightly less brain blood flow during a fast-thinking task, but it wasn't strong enough to count as proof.

Score breakdown, methodology, conflicts of interest, evidence analysis & raw study data

Publication

Journal

Brain Sciences

Year

2023

Authors

Terence Moriarty, Kelsey Bourbeau, Katie Dorman, Lance Runyon, Noah Glaser, J. Brandt, Mallory Hoodjer, Scott C. Forbes, D. Candow

Open Access
15 citations
Analysis v5
Fit Body Science verdict — we translate health studies into clear verdicts backed by peer-reviewed research.

Not medical advice. For informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.